STATE v. MacDONALD

No. 8806-34040; CA A62867.

803 P.2d 1211 (1990)

105 Or. App. 102

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. William Scotty MacDONALD, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 26, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Helen L. Cooper, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Ferder, Ogdahl, Brandt & Casebeer, Salem.

Rives Kistler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen. and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


EDMONDS, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress. The denial was based on the trial court's conclusion that his rights under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution were not violated. We affirm.

While two police officers were on highway patrol duty in separate vehicles, they saw defendant driving a car at an excessive speed. As they pursued...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases