COMMITTEE IN OPPOSITION v. OR. EM. CORR.

SC S36626 (control), S36641.

792 P.2d 1203 (1990)

309 Or. 678

COMMITTEE IN OPPOSITION to the Prison in Malheur County, an Unincorporated Association, Larry J. White, Judy G. White, Donald E. Lewis, Gary Davis, Lois Davis, Carmen Kramer, George Kingsbury, Betty Kingsbury, Donna L. Christensen, Rudolph Cada, Rose Marie Cada, Betty J. White, Carlo Fenicottero, Mrs. Carlo Fenicottero, Howard Wilkins, Mrs. Howard Wilkins, Ted Boxberger, Mrs. Ted Boxberger, George Miller and Evelyn Miller, Petitioners, v. OREGON EMERGENCY CORRECTIONS FACILITY SITING AUTHORITY AND OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Oregon State Agencies, Respondents. Committee in Opposition to the Prison in Malheur County, an Unincorporated Association, Larry J. White, Judy G. White, Donald E. Lewis, Gary Davis, Lois Davis, Carmen Kramer, George Kingsbury, Betty Kingsbury, Donna L. Christensen, Rudolph Cada, Rose Marie Cada, Betty J. White, Carlo Fenicottero, Mrs. Carlo Fenicottero, Howard Wilkins, Mrs. Howard Wilkins, Ted Boxberger, Mrs. Ted Boxberger, George Miller and Evelyn Miller, Petitioners, v. Neil Goldschmidt, Governor of Oregon, Oregon Emergency Facility Siting Authority and Oregon Department of Corrections, Oregon State Agencies, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided April 26, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen L. Johnson, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs, for petitioners. With him on the opening brief, were John Shurts, Eugene, and Bill Van Atta, Ontario.

Michael D. Reynolds, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondents. With him on the brief, were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.


JONES, Justice.

Petitioners challenge the siting of a proposed prison in their community. This court has direct review of the consolidated challenges to the siting decisions of the Oregon Emergency Corrections Facility Siting Authority (the Siting Authority) and the Governor. See Or. Laws 1989, ch. 789, § 10(2). Petitioners' challenges to those decisions are dismissed.

FACTS

The following chronology generally replicates the sequence of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases