PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises two points, neither of which we conclude to have merit, but one of which warrants discussion.
We hold that appellant waived his right to a determination of his ability to pay the restitution subsequently ordered by the trial court by failing to preserve same when entering his plea. The only issue which was preserved and remained for the trial court was the amount of restitution.
ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and OFTEDAL...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
