1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 799 P.2d
  5. 799 P.2d 1135 (1990)
 

STATE v. WONDERLING

89C20253, 89C20254; CA A62419 (Control), CA A62420.

799 P.2d 1135 (1990)

104 Or.App. 204

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Beauford Darling WONDERLING, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 24, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Michael Alexander, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant. With him on the brief was Burt, Swanson, Lathen, Alexander & McCann, Salem.

Michael C. Livingston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

EDMONDS, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375, sodomy in the first degree, ORS 163.405, and delivery of a controlled substance to a minor. ORS 475.995. He asserts that the trial court erred by excluding evidence that the victim had made false accusations of sexual misconduct against another man.1 We affirm.

At trial, defendant denied any sexual contact with the victim and sought to impeach...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases