SALLY FRANK, COMPLAINANT-APPELLANT,
v.
IVY CLUB, TIGER INN, AND TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS, AND UNIVERSITY COTTAGE CLUB, RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued January 30, 1990.
Decided July 3, 1990.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Sally Frank, pro se, and Nadine Taub argued the cause for appellant (Nadine Taub and Sally Frank, attorneys; Anna May Sheppard, of counsel).
Wendy L. Mager argued the cause for respondent Trustees of Princeton University (Smith, Stratton, Wise, Heher & Brennan, attorneys).
Susan L. Reisner, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Division on Civil Rights (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
Barbara Strapp Nelson argued the cause for respondent Ivy Club (McCarthy and Schatzman, attorneys).
Russel H. Beatie, Jr., a member of the New York bar, argued the cause for respondent Tiger Inn (Lum, Hoens, Abeles, Conant & Danzis, attorneys).
Richard E. Shapiro, Director, Division of Public Interest Advocacy, argued the cause for amicus curiae Public Advocate (Thomas S. Smith, Acting Public Advocate, attorney).
Denise Reinhardt submitted briefs on behalf of amicus curiae New Jersey Coalition on Civil Rights Enforcement (Reinhardt & Schachter, attorneys).
Tanya E. Pushnack submitted a letter brief on behalf of amicus curiae Princeton Undergraduates for Co-Educated Eating Clubs (Zazzali, Zazzali, Fagella & Nowak, attorneys).
Joan Pransky submitted a brief on behalf of amici curiae American Jewish Congress, Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith and Community Relations Committee of the United Jewish Federation of MetroWest (Joan Pransky, attorney; Joan Pransky and Jeremy S. Garber, on the brief).
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J.
This appeal concerns whether the New Jersey Division on Civil Rights (Division) followed the proper administrative procedure in concluding that it had jurisdiction under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -42 (LAD), over the Tiger Inn and Ivy Club (Clubs), all-male eating Clubs at Princeton University. Central to the resolution of the jurisdictional issue is whether the Clubs...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
