RODGERS v. RODGERS

No. 89-2453.

561 So.2d 1357 (1990)

Virginia S. RODGERS, Appellant, v. William J. RODGERS, Jr., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 7, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

S. Sue Robbins of Matthies, Cross, deBoisblanc, Haldin & Robbins, Ocala, for appellant.

Young J. Simmons of Green and Simmons, Ocala, for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

We affirm the decision below because we cannot characterize as clearly erroneous the determination of the trial judge that the monthly payment provisions of the property settlement agreement were not intended to be alimony. If a party to a dissolution agreement wishes monthly support payments to be construed as alimony, and therefore modifiable in the future, it is prudent that such intent be expressed in the agreement.

COWART and GRIFFIN, JJ....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases