PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff brought this action for damages resulting from a fall at defendant's store. At trial, defendant introduced medical testimony to the effect that plaintiff's symptoms were feigned. On rebuttal, plaintiff sought to introduce testimony of a psychiatrist who had examined him. The trial court excluded the psychiatrist's testimony pursuant to ORCP 44 D(2), because plaintiff had failed to respond timely to defendant's request for production of a report...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
