1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 795 P.2d
  5. 795 P.2d 1114 (1990)
 

STATE v. ZEIGLER

T105187A; CA A60516.

795 P.2d 1114 (1990)

103 Or.App. 107

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Arthur Stephen ZEIGLER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 8, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Stephen Zeigler, Aloha, filed the brief pro se for appellant.

Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Janet A. Klapstein, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a traffic conviction for having a defective brake light. ORS 816.330; ORS 816.320(1)(d).1 On de novo review, ORS 46.430(4), we hold that the state failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that at least one side of defendant's brake light system was defective.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases