WASHINGTON WASTE SYS., INC. v. CLARK COUNTY

No. 56395-1.

115 Wn.2d 74 (1990)

794 P.2d 508

WASHINGTON WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., Respondent, v. CLARK COUNTY, ET AL, Appellants, TIDEWATER BARGE LINES, INC., Intervenor.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 26, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur D. Curtis, Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard S. Lowry, Senior Deputy, for appellant Clark County.

Landerholm, Memovich, Lansverk & Whitesides, Inc., P.S., Gregory J. Dennis, and Donald A. Greig, for respondent.

Williams, Kastner & Gibbs, by Randall B. Printz, for intervenor.

P. Stephen DiJulio, J. Tayloe Washburn, and Aliza C. Allen on behalf of Washington State Association of Counties and Klickitat County, amici curiae for appellants.


UTTER, J.

Clark County used an alternative to the competitive bidding process to select Tidewater Barge Lines (Tidewater) as the vendor for a solid waste disposal contract.1 Washington Waste Systems (hereinafter WWS), a disappointed bidder, challenged the use of the alternative procedure and the selection of Tidewater. The trial court ruled that Clark County could not use the alternative procedure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases