CLARK v. SCHUMACHER

CA A61265.

795 P.2d 1093 (1990)

102 Or.App. 1

William Nate CLARK, Petitioner, v. Dave SCHUMACHER, Rules Coordinator, Department of Corrections, and Fred Pearce, Director, Department of Corrections, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 8, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Nate Clark, Pendleton, filed the brief pro se for petitioner.

Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and John A. Reuling, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, filed the brief for respondents.

Before GRABER, P.J. Pro Tem., JOSEPH, C.J., and EDMONDS, J.


JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of the validity of two Department of Corrections rules that authorize fines for prison disciplinary violations. ORS 183.400.

The rules are titled "Inmate Prohibited Conduct and Procedure for Processing Disciplinary Actions." The notice of intended rulemaking was dated January 29, 1989. The amendments were effective on April 21, 1989. OAR 291-105-036 is headed "Imposition of Sanctions-Informal Disciplinary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases