1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 900 F.2d
  5. 900 F.2d 986 (1990)
 

PATTISON v. EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CORP.

No. 89-1517.

900 F.2d 986 (1990)

K.L. PATTISON and Pattison, Stanger & Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CORP., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided April 20, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James W. Heckman, Daniel S. Saylor, Nancy J. Bourget (argued), Garan, Lucow, Miller, Seward, Cooper & Becker, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiffs-appellees.

John R. Monnich, Mary Jo Diegel (argued), J. Michael Malloy, Holahan, Malloy, Maybaugh & Monnich, Troy, Mich., for defendant-appellant.

Before NELSON and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and BERTELSMAN, District Judge.

BERTELSMAN, District Judge.

The proper resolution of this appeal from the grant of summary judgment for the insured in this action on an errors and omissions policy presents little difficulty once the facts are understood. We hold that the trial court, per Judge Duggan, correctly held that an obligation to defend the underlying action against the insureds existed under the ambiguous provisions of the policy.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases