PER CURIAM.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
We agree that the trial court erred in admitting testimony by a police officer that appellant had stated to him more than two (2) years before the incident in question that he had once possessed a shotgun belonging to his grandfather. There was no showing that this evidence was relevant to the charge being tried. See Huhn v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.