LOONEY v. AHO

860855; CA A60843.

795 P.2d 1089 (1990)

102 Or.App. 588

Daniel P. LOONEY, Appellant, and Clarence Kiser, Plaintiff, v. Carol Diane AHO, Respondent, and Gordon M. Riggs, and All Other Persons or Parties Unknown, Claiming Any Right, Title, Estate, Lien, or Interest in the Mining Claims Described in the Complaint, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 1, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warde H. Erwin, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Erwin & Erwin, P.C., Portland.

Alan H. Johansen, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Stewart M. Whipple and Whipple & Johansen, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

In Looney and Kiser v. Aho, 94 Or.App. 575, 767 P.2d 934, rev. den. 307 Or. 611, 772 P.2d 1341 (1989), we rejected plaintiff's appeal from the judgment in this case and affirmed without opinion. While the appeal was pending, plaintiff moved for, and we allowed, leave to file a motion in the trial court to set aside the judgment. Former ORCP 71 B(2).1 However...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases