AMOR FAMILY BROADCASTING GROUP v. F.C.C.

No. 89-1366.

918 F.2d 960 (1990)

AMOR FAMILY BROADCASTING GROUP, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, Estereotempo, Inc., Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided November 16, 1990.

As Amended January 4, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan W. Emord, with whom Richard J. Bodorff, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner.

Gregory M. Christopher, Atty., F.C.C., for respondents. James F. Rill, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert B. Nicholson, and David Seidman, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Daniel M. Armstrong, Associate Gen. Counsel, and David Silberman, Counsel, F.C.C., Washington, D.C., were on the brief for respondents.

Edward S. O'Neill, Washington, D.C., entered an appearance, for intervenor.

Before EDWARDS, D.H. GINSBURG, and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.


Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Amor Family Broadcasting Group ("Amor" or "Petitioner") is appealing a decision of the Federal Communications Commission ("the Commission" or "FCC") dismissing a rulemaking petition to allocate a radio channel to Santa Isabel, Puerto Rico. As the petitioner has failed to show that the FCC's decision was unreasonable or inconsistent with FCC policy, we affirm the FCC...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases