OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. DODGE

No. 89-2212.

52 Ohio St. 3d 132 (1990)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. DODGE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 27, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Mark H. Aultman, for relator.

Dinsmore & Shohl, Mark A. VanderLaan and Kenneth S. Resnick, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the instant record, we agree that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules as found by the board and that this requires a severe sanction. However, because we believe it is unlikely that respondent will repeat his misconduct, we find an indefinite suspension inappropriate. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of two years. Costs taxed to respondent.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases