1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 747 F.Supp.
  5. 747 F.Supp. 1085 (1990)
 

ERVIN v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF NEW JERSEY

No. 89 Civ. 2175 (RPP).

747 F.Supp. 1085 (1990)

Scott A. ERVIN, Plaintiff, v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF NEW JERSEY and Steven B. Siegel, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

As Amended October 23, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David G. Trachtenberg, New York City, for plaintiff.

Fink Weinberger, P.C. by Stephen E. Powers, New York City, for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.

Defendants Cushman & Wakefield of New Jersey ("C & W") and Stephen Siegel ("Siegel") move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, claiming that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Plaintiff Scott A. Ervin ("Ervin") brings this action 1) to recover a real...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases