1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 221 Cal.App.3d
  5. 221 Cal.App.3d 1601 (1990)
 

SELMA PRESSURE TREATING CO. v. OSMOSE WOOD PRES.

Docket Nos. F009421, F010070, F010710.

221 Cal.App.3d 1601 (1990)

271 Cal. Rptr. 596

SELMA PRESSURE TREATING COMPANY, INC., et al., Cross-complainants and Appellants, v. OSMOSE WOOD PRESERVING COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., Cross-defendant and Respondent. GERALD D. PETERY et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO COUNTY, Respondent; REICHHOLD CHEMICALS, INC., et al., Real Parties in Interest. GERALD D. PETERY et al., Cross-complainants and Appellants, v. REICHOLD CHEMICALS, INC., et al., Cross-defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

June 25, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Bergman & Wedner, Gregory M. Bergman, Kevin D. Sheehy, Kimble, MacMichael & Upton, Sylvia H. Coyle, David Douglas Doyle, Carlton R. Ericson and Jon Wallace Upton for Cross-complainants and Appellants and for Petitioners.

Diehl, Steinheimer, Riggio, Haydel & Mordaunt, Scott Malm, Karen Denise Lee, Thomas, Snell, Jamison, Russell & Asperger, E. Robert Wright, French, Rogers, Kezelis & Kominiarek, James M. Hofert, Kirkland & Ellis, Bruce A. Featherstone, Scott R. Bauer, Philip A. Brimmer, Gibson & Gibson, John D. Gibson, Katherine O. Gibson, Parichan, Renberg, Crossman & Harvey, Stephen T. Knudsen, Rutan & Tucker, Jayne Taylor, Mark B. Frazier, Marshall M. Pearlman, Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, Robert L. Shuftan, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, James L. Gault, Kevin J. Dunne, Michael F. Healy and William P. Keane for Cross-defendants and Respondents and for Real Parties in Interest.

No appearance for Respondent Superior Court.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.†]

OPINION

ARDAIZ, J.

The consolidated cases before us challenge the propriety of the sustaining of several demurrers of various cross-defendants to cross-complaints filed by Selma Pressure Treating Company, Inc. (SPTC), Mary Ann Schuessler and Gerald Petery and Selma Leasing Company, Inc. (SLC). The cross-complainants were, in turn, defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases