1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 893 F.2d
  5. 893 F.2d 925 (1990)
 

CAMPBELL v. INGERSOLL MILL. MACH. CO.

No. 88-2796.

893 F.2d 925 (1990)

Sharon CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INGERSOLL MILLING MACHINE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, and Henry Ortland, individually, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided January 23, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward F. Diedrich (argued), DeKalb, Ill., for Sharon Campbell, plaintiff-appellant.

Karl W. Grabemann, McDermott, Will & Emery, Chicago, Ill., Leonard C. Remencius, Mary J. Gaziano, Remencius & Associates, Edward J. Fahy, James D. Zeglis (argued), Reno, Zahm, Folgate, Lindberg & Powell, Rockford, Ill., for Ingersoll Milling Mach. Co. and Henry Ortland, defendants-appellees.

Before CUDAHY, EASTERBROOK, and MANION, Circuit Judges.

MANION, Circuit Judge.

Sharon Campbell, a black woman, began working for the Ingersoll Milling Machine Company (Ingersoll) in 1980 as a security guard. In 1985, Campbell left her employment at Ingersoll. Campbell claimed she was fired; Ingersoll claimed that Campbell left voluntarily.

On May 4, 1985, Campbell filed a charge with the EEOC, alleging that Ingersoll fired her because of her race and sex. Specifically, Campbell alleged she had been working on Ingersoll...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases