1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 736 F.Supp.
  5. 736 F.Supp. 1049 (1990)
 

DAWSON v. ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO., INC.

Civ. A. No. 89-A-1956.

736 F.Supp. 1049 (1990)

Dianne and Gary DAWSON, Plaintiffs, v. ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

February 20, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Meyer, Baine P. Kerr and Reed D. Benson, Hutchinson, Black, Hill & Cook, Boulder, Colo., for plaintiffs.

John R. Trigg and Arthur R. Karstaedt, Hall & Evans, Denver, Colo., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ARRAJ, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on two formal motions. The first is the Motion of Plaintiffs Dianne and Gary Dawson ("Dawsons") to Remand under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (1988) "on the basis of [a] defect in removal procedure." In the event that the court remands, Defendant has requested that it certify the issue of interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b) (1988) to the Tenth Circuit. The second is the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases