1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 911 F.2d
  5. 911 F.2d 868 (1990)
 

DOE v. CONN. DEPT. OF CHILD & YOUTH SERVICES

No. 536, Docket 89-7601.

911 F.2d 868 (1990)

John DOE b/k/a Mary Doe, Mary Doe and Frank Doe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CHILD AND YOUTH SERVICES and Mark J. Marcus, Raymond Farrington, Patricia Simpson, and David Goldner, individually and officially as employees of the Connecticut Department of Child and Youth Services, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided August 13, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph D. Garrison, New Haven, Conn. (Garrison, Kahn, Silbert & Arterton, New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Daniel R. Schaefer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hartford, Conn. (Clarine Nardi Riddle, Atty. Gen., Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for defendants-appellees.

Before TIMBERS, NEWMAN, and ALTIMARI, Circuit Judges.

JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal, like van Emrik v. Chemung County Dep't of Social Services, 911 F.2d 863 (2d Cir.1990), decided this day, concerns the availability of the qualified immunity defense in the context of temporary interruption of parental custody. Two parents and their minor child appeal from the May 19, 1989, judgment of the District Court for the District of Connecticut (Peter C. Dorsey, Judge) dismissing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases