IN RE TINSLEY

No. 89-954.

582 A.2d 1192 (1990)

In re Lindell TINSLEY, Respondent, A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided December 3, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ross T. Dicker, Asst. Bar Counsel, with whom Thomas E. Flynn, Bar Counsel, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner.

R. Kenneth Mundy and David Carr, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, and NEWMAN and FARRELL, Associate Judges.


NEWMAN, Associate Judge:

This matter comes before us on the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility ("Board"). Involved are six separate matters, which have been consolidated for review. After evidentiary hearings on each of these matters, the Board found fifteen violations of the Disciplinary Rules and recommended that respondent be suspended for one year with reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness to practice. We accept...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases