1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 225 Cal.App.3d
  5. 225 Cal.App.3d 1534 (1990)
 

DePALMA v. WESTLAND SOFTWARE HOUSE

Docket No. B031953.

225 Cal.App.3d 1534 (1990)

276 Cal. Rptr. 214

JOHN R. DePALMA et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. WESTLAND SOFTWARE HOUSE, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

December 7, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

George & Dapeer and Philip D. Dapeer for Defendant and Appellant.

Shapiro, Posell & Close, Richard E. Posell and Lisa K. Skaist for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

JOHNSON, J.

This is a case of first impression in California.

The principal issue before us is whether evidence of tax benefits which a plaintiff may have received because of the expense of a contract should be considered in determining compensatory damages for the defendant's breach of that contract. For the reasons stated below, we hold that such evidence is irrelevant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases