STATE v. SUAREZ

Case No. 880309-CA.

793 P.2d 934 (1990)

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Gilberto SUAREZ, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

May 25, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lisa J. Remal, Richard G. Uday, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

R. Paul Van Dam, Elizabeth Holbrook, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellee.

Before DAVIDSON, BILLINGS and ORME, JJ.


OPINION

ORME, Judge:

Gilberto Suarez appeals his conviction for aggravated assault. On appeal he makes two challenges to the jury selection process and also argues the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. His challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is without merit.1 We conclude one of defendant's arguments about jury selection is well-taken and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

In 1988, defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases