1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 745 F.Supp.
  5. 745 F.Supp. 982 (1990)
 

SHAW v. ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INC.

No. 86 Civ. 5244 (WCC).

745 F.Supp. 982 (1990)

Leslie SHAW, Plaintiff, v. ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

As Amended Nunc Pro Tunc December 17, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Soller, Singer & Horn, Carl R. Soller, Ellen L. Federman, of counsel, New York City, for plaintiff.

Gibney, Anthony & Flaherty, Stephen F. Ruffino, of counsel, New York City, for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.

Defendants Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. and Rolex Industries, Inc. ("Rolex") seek judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c), Fed.R.Civ.P., dismissing the action for failure to state a claim. Defendant Montres Rolex, S.A. ("Montres") seeks an order dismissing the complaint under Rule 4(j) or 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. for failure to serve process upon Montres within 120 days after filing the complaint. For...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases