1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 217 Cal.App.3d
  5. 217 Cal.App.3d 1509 (1990)
 

SADE SHOE CO., INC. v. OSCHIN & SNYDER

Docket No. B029458.

217 Cal.App.3d 1509 (1990)

266 Cal. Rptr. 619

SADE SHOE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. OSCHIN & SNYDER et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

February 16, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Richard K. Kudo for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Rubin & Rahe, Kenneth B. Goodfried and Ken Nathanson for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

JOHNSON, J.

Plaintiff Sade Shoe Company, Inc. (Sade) appeals from the summary judgment entered in its action against respondents Oschin & Snyder and Oschin & Snyder II (collectively referred to as Oschin). On appeal, Sade argues the trial court erroneously held its action was barred by the statute of limitations. We disagree. We further hold the trial court properly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases