1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 225 Cal.App.3d
  5. 225 Cal.App.3d 1498 (1990)
 

SANDOVAL v. STATE PERSONNEL BD.

Docket Nos. F013205, F013235.

225 Cal.App.3d 1498 (1990)

275 Cal. Rptr. 702

JOSEPH N. SANDOVAL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, Defendant and Respondent. DARROLL WILLIAMS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

December 4, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Young, Wooldridge, Paulden, Self, Farr & Griffin and Philip W. Ganong for Plaintiffs and Appellants. John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Henry G. Ullerich and Thomas Scheerer, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BEST, P.J.

These consolidated appeals present the novel issue whether petitioners are entitled to the protection of Penal Code1 section 1000.5 when appealing their terminations as correctional officers. We conclude they are not and affirm the judgments.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Darroll Williams and Joseph Sandoval (petitioners) were correctional officers at the Tehachapi Correctional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases