V.C. VIDEO, INC. v. NATIONAL VIDEO, INC.

Civ. A. No. 88-1036-T.

755 F.Supp. 962 (1990)

V.C. VIDEO, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL VIDEO, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

November 29, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur H. Davis, Busch, Johnson, Davis, Wirth & Mank, Wichita, Kan., for plaintiffs.

James M. Armstrong, Foulston & Siefkin, Wichita, Kan., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

THEIS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 29). The court does not believe oral argument would be of material assistance and therefore denies the parties' requests for argument.

Plaintiffs, former franchisees of Popingo Video, Inc. ("Popingo"), contend that defendant National Video, Inc. ("National") wrongfully interfered with the plaintiffs' contracts with Popingo...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases