GARZON v. D.C. COM'N ON HUMAN RIGHTS

No. 89-701.

578 A.2d 1134 (1990)

Francisco GARZON, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, Respondent, Marriott Corporation, Intervenor.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided July 24, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph V. Kaplan, Silver Spring, Md., with whom Robert Lubin, Alexandria, Va., was on the briefs, for petitioner.

Julienne W. Bramesco, with whom Carlton J. Trosclair, Bethesda, was on the brief, for intervenor.

Respondent filed a statement in lieu of brief adopting intervenor's position.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, and NEWMAN and FERREN, Associate Judges.


FERREN, Associate Judge:

Francisco Garzon petitions for review of a Final Decision and Order of the District of Columbia Commission on Human Rights granting a motion to enforce a settlement—based on an oral agreement—between Garzon and Marriott Corporation. After a hearing on liability, the Commission determined that Marriott unlawfully had discriminated against Garzon, on the basis of gender, in terminating his employment. Before completion of the hearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases