1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 793 P.2d
  5. 793 P.2d 885 (1990)
 

1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v. LANE COUNTY

LUBA 89-132; CA A64166.

793 P.2d 885 (1990)

102 Or.App. 68

1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, v. LANE COUNTY, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 6, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen L. Vohres, Asst. County Counsel, Eugene, argued the cause, for petitioner — cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Lane County Office of Legal Counsel, Eugene.

Neil S. Kagan, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief, for respondent — cross-petitioner.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

ORS 197.763 establishes a general requirement that a party must raise issues before the local decision-making body in order to raise them in appeals to LUBA.1 The statute also creates notice and procedural requirements to facilitate the presentation and preservation of issues at the local level. Through amendments to section 14.300(5) of its code, Lane County adopted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases