1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 741 F.Supp.
  5. 741 F.Supp. 936 (1990)
 

N.A.R., S.p.A. v. U.S.

Court No. 88-06-00401.

741 F.Supp. 936 (1990)

N.A.R., S.p.A., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.

United States Court of International Trade.

June 26, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, Brian S. Goldstein and Judith M. Barzilay; of counsel: David Newman, New York City, for plaintiff.

Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Elizabeth C. Seastrum, Washington, D.C., and Velta A. Melnbrencis, New York City, of counsel: Diane McDevitt, Washington, D.C., Atty.-Advisor, Intern. Trade Admin., U.S. Dept. of Commerce, for defendant.

OPINION

TSOUCALAS, Judge:

Plaintiff, N.A.R., S.p.A. ("NAR"), brings this action pursuant to section 516A(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2)(B)(iii) (1988), to contest the final results of an antidumping duty administrative review covering pressure sensitive plastic tape from Italy. The ITA determined therein that an antidumping margin of 6.39 percent existed on NAR's sales of the tape in the United States.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases