URBIGKIT, Chief Justice.
This appeal determines whether a trial judge is required to inform an immunized witness of the consequences of refusal to testify before charging and convicting that individual of criminal contempt.
In her appeal, appellant Michele Jaramillo claims that "[t]he trial court's failure to adequately inform appellant of the nature and effect of a finding of criminal contempt warrants a reversal of the contempt...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.