1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 738 F.Supp.
  5. 738 F.Supp. 933 (1990)
 

ZACK v. NCR CORP.

Civ. A. No. 89-8506.

738 F.Supp. 933 (1990)

Leonard ZACK v. NCR CORPORATION.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

June 21, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward L. Wolf, Segal, Wolf, Berk, Gaines & Liss, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Ira P. Tiger, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this case, an attorney, alleges that representatives of defendant NCR Corporation tortiously interfered with a contingency fee contract into which he and a client had entered. His theory is that NCR personnel demanded, as a condition precedent to a settlement agreement between NCR and his client, that the client fire the plaintiff. Subject matter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases