BROGAN v. SAN MATEO COUNTY

No. 88-15809.

901 F.2d 762 (1990)

William BROGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAN MATEO COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 18, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Brogan, San Jose, Cal., pro se.

Deborah Penny Bennett, Deputy County Counsel, Redwood City, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before BOOCHEVER, WIGGINS and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.


BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

William Brogan appeals pro se the dismissal of his section 1983 complaint challenging the constitutionality of the workfare program in San Mateo County and alleging that participation in the program violated his civil rights. We affirm.

FACTS

On June 10, 1988, Brogan filed a complaint in the district court for the Northern District of California, challenging his mandatory participation in San Mateo County's Vocational Rehabilitation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases