SILVERSTEIN v. CARLSON

No. 18203.

797 P.2d 856 (1990)

118 Idaho 456

Barry SILVERSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant Cross Respondent, v. Ronald D. CARLSON, Watermaster; Dee O'Brien, Deputy Watermaster, Defendants-Respondents, and Vernal Foster, Defendant-Respondent Cross Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

August 30, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hopkins, French, Crockett, Springer & Hoopes, Idaho Falls, for plaintiff-appellant. C. Timothy Hopkins argued.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., A. Lynne Krogh-Hampe, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for defendants-respondents Carlson and O'Brien. A. Lynne Krogh-Hampe argued.

Anderson, Pike & Bush, Idaho Falls, for defendant-respondent Foster. Edward W. Pike argued.


JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a water rights case. The primary issue presented is whether the trial court correctly interpreted a prior adjudication of water rights as establishing priority to the use of certain waters and properly apportioned the rights to the water. We hold that there was substantial and competent evidence to support the interpretation of the trial court, that the trial court used the appropriate method of allocating the rights to the water, and that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases