1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 220 Cal.App.3d
  5. 220 Cal.App.3d 1418 (1990)
 

NORTH STATE DEV. v. PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL

Docket No. A045009.

220 Cal.App.3d 1418 (1990)

270 Cal. Rptr. 166

NORTH STATE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

May 31, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Miller, Starr & Regalia, John Sprankling, Edmund L. Regalia and William R. Plapinger for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Lozano, Smith, Smith & Woliver, Louis T. Lozano and Barbara Booth Grunwald for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

LOW, P.J.

Plaintiffs North State Development Company (North State) and A.D. Seeno Construction Company (Seeno) appeal from the judgment dismissing their case after a demurrer was sustained to their third amended mandamus petition challenging the imposition of a "school facilities fee" on new residential construction by defendant Pittsburg Unified School District (the District). We conclude the trial court erred in applying...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases