1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 801 P.2d
  5. 801 P.2d 828 (1990)
 

IN RE WEIDNER

OSB 86-138; SC S36671.

801 P.2d 828 (1990)

310 Or. 757

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Roger G. WEIDNER, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided November 26, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger G. Weidner, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs pro se for the accused.

Martha M. Hicks, Asst. Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the brief for the Oregon State Bar.

Before PETERSON, C.J., CARSON, GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, and UNIS, JJ., and GRABER, J. Pro Tem.

PER CURIAM.

In this lawyer discipline case, we determine de novo whether accused violated (1) two disciplinary rules prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, and knowingly making a false statement of law or fact, and (2) four disciplinary rules regulating conflicts of interest between a lawyer and a client or among multiple clients of the same lawyer.1

Because the dishonesty or deception...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases