MURRAY v. DIST. OF COL. BD. OF ZONING

No. 89-646.

572 A.2d 1055 (1990)

Frank P. MURRAY, et al., Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided April 9, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benny L. Kass, with whom Catherine Haley Rost, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners.

Lutz Alexander Prager, Asst. Deputy Corp. Counsel, with whom Herbert O. Reid, Sr., Acting Corp. Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent.

Before TERRY, STEADMAN and FARRELL, Associate Judges.


Petition for Review of an Order of the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

PER CURIAM:

Petitioners challenge a decision of the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment (the Board) that proposed Lot 39, Square 1995, owned by petitioners, does not meet the 50-foot minimum average width requirement for a lot situated in an R-1-B zoning district, as required by 11 DCMR § 401.3 (1987). Petitioners contend primarily that the Board acted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases