STATE v. NERO

No. 89-1675.

56 Ohio St. 3d 106 (1990)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. NERO, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 19, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and George J. Sadd, for appellant.

Michael E. Murman, for appellee.


H. BROWN, J.

This case presents the issue of whether the trial judge substantially complied with Crim. R. 11(C)(2)(a) when he accepted a guilty plea for the nonprobationable crime of rape without informing the defendant that he was not eligible for probation. For the reasons which follow, we hold that there was substantial compliance and reverse the decision of the court of appeals.

Ohio Crim. R. 11(C) was adopted in order to facilitate a more accurate determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases