EMPLOYMENT DIV. v. SEARS ROEBUCK & CO.

89-AB-754; CA A61322.

794 P.2d 828 (1990)

102 Or.App. 490

EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Petitioner, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. and Carole L. Whitehead, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 18, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Janet A. Metcalf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

No appearance for respondents.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


DEITS, Judge.

Employment Division (Division) seeks review of an Employment Appeals Board (EAB) order holding claimant eligible for unemployment benefits. The issue is whether, in determining whether a claimant is disqualified from benefits for voluntarily leaving work without good cause, only the separation from the last employer may be considered.

Claimant had worked part-time at Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Sears). On October 11, 1988, she also began working...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases