1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 220 Cal.App.3d
  5. 220 Cal.App.3d 1392 (1990)
 

FLANZER v. BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS

Docket No. G006277.

220 Cal.App.3d 1392 (1990)

271 Cal. Rptr. 583

ARNOLD H. FLANZER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

May 30, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Tuohey & Prasse, Conrad G. Tuohey, Gene R. Prasse and Ferdinand V. Gonzales for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, and Alan A. Mangels, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Respondent

OPINION

COX, J.*

Appellant Arnold H. Flanzer appeals from a denial of his petition for writ of mandate challenging the propriety of conditions imposed by the Board of Dental Examiners (Board) when Flanzer's application for reinstatement of his license to practice dentistry was granted.

Flanzer's license was revoked effective October 12, 1980, based on Board findings of gross ignorance or inefficiency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases