1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 909 F.2d
  5. 909 F.2d 698 (1990)
 

ITEL CONTAINERS v. ATLANTTRAFIK EXP. SERVICE LTD.

Nos. 1249, 1250, 1251, Dockets 90-7012, 90-7042 and 90-7044.

909 F.2d 698 (1990)

ITEL CONTAINERS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Flexi-Van Leasing Inc., Cross-County Leasing Ltd., now named Textainer Inc., & Textainer Special Equipment Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ATLANTTRAFIK EXPRESS SERVICE LTD., in personam, and M/V TAVARA, AES Express, AES Challenge, Nagara and Cavara, their engines, boilers, tackle, freights, etc., in rem, and Sea Containers Ltd., Seaco Services Ltd., Sea Containers Australia Ltd., Seaco Inc., and Sea Containers America Inc., in personam, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided July 16, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred E. Yudes, Jr., New York City (Wendy D. Ciolino, Watson, Farley & Williams, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant Itel Containers Intern. Corp.

O'Melveny & Myers, New York City (Andrew J. Frackman, Elisa L. Liang, New York City, of counsel), submitted a brief for plaintiff-appellant Flexi-Van Leasing, Inc.

Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City (Michael D. Wilson, New York City, of counsel), submitted a brief for plaintiffs-appellants Textainer Inc. and Textainer Special Equipment Ltd.

Beth D. Jacob, New York City (James Gadsden, Barbara Q. Gray, Andris J. Vizbaras, and Drake A. Colley, Carter Ledyard & Milburn, New York City, on the brief), for appellees other than Atlanttrafik Express Service Ltd.

Before VAN GRAAFEILAND, NEWMAN and KEARSE, Circuit Judges.

KEARSE, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs Itel Containers International Corporation ("Itel"), et al., appeal from a final judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York after a bench trial before Robert L. Carter, Judge, dismissing their complaint seeking recovery for losses incurred in leasing containers to defendant Atlanttrafik Express Service Ltd. ("AES Ltd."). The district court ruled principally that defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases