UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
Robert H. BAILIN, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 16, 1990.
February 16, 1990.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Jeffrey B. Steinback, Genson, Steinback, & Gillespie, Chicago, Ill., for Robert Bailin.
Jerry D. Sparks and Noel Dennis, Chicago, Ill., for Tom Crouch.
Robert M. Stephenson, Cotsirilos, Crowley, Stephenson, Tighe & Streicker, Chicago, Ill., for James Marren.
David J. Stetler, McDermott, Will & Emery, Chicago, Ill., for Joseph O'Malley.
Eugene J. Kelley, Jr., Arnstein & Lehr, Chicago, Ill., for Mike Greenfield.
Steven J. Rosenberg, Rosenberg, Opdycke, Gildea, Hellner & Kelly, Chicago, Ill., for Ray Pace.
William P. Murphy, Murphy, Peters, Davis & O'Brien, Chicago, Ill., for Martin Riley, Jr.
James Meltreger, Onesto, Giglio, Meltreger & Associates, Chicago, Ill., for Michael Sidel.
James Streicker, Cotsirilos, Crowley, Stephenson, Tighe & Streicker, Chicago, Ill., for Mike Smith.
Patrick A. Tuite, Tuite, Mejia & Giachetti, Chicago, Ill., for Gary Wright.
Michael Lorge, Laser, Kolman & Frank, Chicago, Ill., for Aric March.
Nicholas J. Etten, Foran, Wiss & Schultz, Chicago, Ill., for Daniel Parz.
Charles D. Sklarsky, Robert J. Byman, Jenner & Block, Chicago, Ill., for Matt Newberger.
Michael Goggin, Oak Park, Ill., for Thomas M. Braniff.
Thomas P. Sullivan, Jeffrey Coleman, Jenner & Block, Chicago, Ill., for John Baker.
Thomas A. Durkin, Arnstein & Lehr, Chicago, Ill., for Sam Cali.
Richard Manning, Chicago, Ill., for Michael Christ.
Thomas Shanahan, Mansker & Shanahan, Chicago, Ill., for Ken Maslak.
Frank Stachyra, Riverside, Ill., for Donald Callahan.
Michael D. Monico and Barry A. Spevack, Monico, Pavich & Spevack, Chicago, Ill., for Brian Sledz and James Sledz.
Danie Gillogly, Mark Pollack and Lisa Huestis, Asst. U.S. Attys., for U.S.
United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HART, District Judge.
Under Fed.R.Crim.P. Rule 44(c), the court is required to inquire into the propriety of counsel's joint representation of two or more defendants joined for trial. "Unless it appears that there is good cause to believe no conflict of interest is likely to arise, the court shall take such measures as may be appropriate to protect each defendant's right to counsel." Fed.R.Crim.P. Rule 44(c). In three instances...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
