1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 794 P.2d
  5. 794 P.2d 796 (1990)
 

ADAMS v. KNOTH

No. 85-12-138; CA A45473.

794 P.2d 796 (1990)

102 Or. App. 238

Mary Lou ADAMS, Sandy Blankenship and Dianne Adams, Appellants, v. Mary Lou KNOTH, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 20, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael H. Bloom, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Bloom & Spaulding, Portland.

Deanne L. Darling, West Linn, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Hutchison, Hammond, Walsh, Herndon & Darling, West Linn.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

DEITS, Judge.

In this action for breach of contract and fraud, plaintiffs assign error to the denial of their motion for a directed verdict on defendant's counterclaim for breach of contract, allowance of defendant's motion to amend her pleadings, the allowance of defendant's motion for a directed verdict on plaintiffs' fraud claim and denial of their motions to construe the contract, as well as a number of evidentiary rulings and instructions. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases