SUBURBAN MOTORS v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.

Docket No. C004432.

218 Cal.App.3d 1354 (1990)

268 Cal. Rptr. 16

SUBURBAN MOTORS, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant; CALIFORNIA AUTO DEALER EXCHANGE et al., Cross-defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

March 21, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

William O. Morris, Richard W. Sherwood, J. Martin McAllister and McDonald, Saeltzer, Morris, Creeggan & Waddock for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

John A. Britton and Brian DeAmicis for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Charles M. Farano, Kimberly Briggs Berry and Farano & Kieviet for Cross-defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

PUGLIA. P.J.

Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) appeals from a summary judgment declaring plaintiff, Suburban Motors, Inc., has valid title to an automobile. State Farm contends its title, obtained directly from the lawful owner whom it insured and from whom the vehicle was stolen, is superior to the claim of Suburban Motors, a bona fide purchaser for value under a "chain of title" traceable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases