STATE v. HASTINGS

No. 56964-9.

115 Wn.2d 42 (1990)

793 P.2d 956

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL HASTINGS, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 5, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Drew Zavatsky, Deputy, for petitioner.

Suzanne Lee Elliott of Associated Counsel for the Accused, for respondent.


CALLOW, C.J.

This is an appeal from a criminal conviction in district court which was reversed on review by the Superior Court. The sole question is whether a defendant's consent is necessary before the defendant may be tried by a judge pro tempore in district court. We hold a criminal defendant has neither a constitutional nor a statutory right to insist that his or her consent be given to the authority of a pro tempore judge in district court.

Michael Hastings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases