McKAY CREEK VALLEY v. WASHINGTON COUNTY

LUBA 89-137, 89-138, 89-139, 89-140; CA A66567.

803 P.2d 753 (1990)

104 Or. App. 690

McKAY CREEK VALLEY ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 19, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Blair Batson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief, for petitioner.

David C. Noren, Washington County Counsel, Hillsboro, argued the cause and filed the brief, for respondent.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner appealed to LUBA from a group of Washington County ordinances that amended provisions of the Community Development Code (CDC) relating, inter alia, to standards for allowing farm and forest dwellings. LUBA affirmed county's actions in part and remanded them in part. Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's decision, contending that LUBA erred in rejecting two of its assignments of error. We affirm.

Petitioner contends in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases