Per Curiam.
The commission does not dispute appellant's claim that the Rosenthal and Barnett reports were not considered. Appellant claims this omission constitutes either an abuse of discretion or a denial of due process. For the following reasons, we affirm the court of appeals' decision.
Appellant's due process allegation may be quickly disposed of since it was not raised below. State, ex rel. Gibson, v. Indus. Comm. (1988),
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.