1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 54 Ohio
  5. 54 Ohio St. 3d 98 (1990)
 

NORTH OLMSTED BD. OF EDN. v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 89-955.

54 Ohio St. 3d 98 (1990)

NORTH OLMSTED BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL.; EASTCREEK CORPORATION, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 17, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A., Fred Siegel, Karen H. Bauemschmidt and Todd W. Sleggs, for appellant.

Kolick & Kondzer and Thomas A. Kondzer, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

The issue in this case is whether the decision of the BTA was reasonable and lawful. We find that it was and affirm its decision.

In the absence of evidence of a recent arm's-length sale between a willing buyer under no compulsion to buy and a willing seller under no compulsion to sell, the testimony of expert witnesses becomes necessary. State, ex rel. Park Investment Co., v. Bd...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases