1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 751 F.Supp.
  5. 751 F.Supp. 770 (1990)
 

MERRILL v. CHICAGO & ILLINOIS MIDLAND RY.

No. 88-3177.

751 F.Supp. 770 (1990)

Thomas E. MERRILL, Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO & ILLINOIS MIDLAND RAILWAY, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division.

August 15, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin P. Durkin, Robert A. Clifford & Assoc., P.C., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Charles E. Holt, Hugh J. Graham, III, Graham & Graham, Springfield, Ill., Hugh C. Griffin, David R. Schmidt, Lord Bissell & Brook, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

One thing this Court will not suffer lightly is trial by artifice and ambuscade.

We expect litigants and their counsel to abide by both the letter and the spirit of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and to cooperate fully—within the metes and bounds of our adversarial system—in an effort to uncover the truth and attempt to do justice.

Yet during the course of this litigation we were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases