1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 120 N.J.
  5. 120 N.J. 32 (1990)
 

MATTER OF CHIDIAC

120 N.J. 32 (1990)

575 A.2d 1355

IN THE MATTER OF NORMAN J. CHIDIAC, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 29, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Engelhardt, Assistant Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Allan M. Harris argued the cause for respondent (Ravin, Greenberg & Zackin, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This is an attorney-disciplinary case in which the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB or Board) found that respondent, Norman J. Chidiac, had engaged in unethical conduct warranting public discipline. The ethics violations consisted of a breach of the standards of the Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4 and 1.15. The discipline recommended was a suspension from the practice of law for three years.

I....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases